29 Proven But Hidden Earning Methods
πŸ“‚ View Free Sample πŸš€ Buy Full eBook

Ethereum Account Abstraction in 2025: ERC-4337 vs EIP-7702 (Pectra), Risks & The Future of Smart Accounts

Ethereum Account Abstraction

Ethereum Account Abstraction
Ethereum Account Abstraction

Introduction

Ethereum has long relied on Externally Owned Accounts (EOAs) controlled by a private key. Simple, yesβ€”but unforgiving. Lose your key and your funds are gone. No social recovery, no gas sponsorship, no batch transactions.

That’s why Account Abstraction (AA) is a game-changer. It makes wallets programmable like apps. In 2025, two proposals lead the discussion: ERC-4337 and EIP-7702, part of the Pectra upgrade.

This article is your ultimate guide β€” technical details, adoption numbers, risks, and future standards β€” all in one place.


ERC-4337: What It Does Today

ERC-4337, launched in 2023, created smart contract wallets without a hard fork. It introduces a separate UserOperation mempool and bundlers that package transactions on behalf of users.

Key Features

  • Programmable verification logic (multi-sig, guardians, biometrics)
  • Gas sponsorship via paymasters
  • Batch multiple actions into one
  • Works across Ethereum + Layer-2

Adoption Metrics (as of Sept 2025)

  • ~1.8M smart accounts deployed across Ethereum & L2s (Safe, Argent, ZeroDev, Biconomy).
  • Daily UserOperations: ~250k+ across all networks.
  • Average Gas Overhead: 15–20% higher vs EOAs, mitigated by batching.
EOA vs ERC-4337 smart account
EOA vs ERC-4337 smart account

EIP-7702: The Pectra Upgrade

While ERC-4337 works via smart wallets, EIP-7702 lets an existing EOA temporarily behave like a smart account during a transaction. No need to migrate funds.

Benefits

  • Seamless user transition (no new address)
  • Works with ERC-4337 and future RIP-7560
  • Enables session keys, gasless UX, and social recovery
  • Reduces cognitive friction for mainstream users
EOA with private key β†’ Temporarily enhanced with contract code (7702) β†’ Back to normal.
EOA with private key β†’ Temporarily enhanced with contract code (7702) β†’ Back to normal.

ERC-4337 vs EIP-7702: Comparison

FeatureERC-4337EIP-7702 (Pectra)
DeploymentSmart wallet contractTemporary smart logic for EOAs
Gas FeesHigher due to UserOpsLower, closer to EOA
CompatibilityWorks todayPost-Pectra (2025)
MigrationNew address neededNo migration (same EOA)
BundlersRequiredNot required
PaymastersSupportedSupported
ERC-4337 vs EIP-7702
ERC-4337 vs EIP-7702

What Happened to EIP-3074?

EIP-3074 proposed AUTH & AUTHCALL for EOAs to delegate control to β€œinvokers.” It was dropped because:

  • Risky if invoker is malicious
  • Delegation complexity
  • Not future-proof with abstraction roadmap

Lesson: Ethereum favors safety + compatibility over short-term hacks.


New Standards Coming

  • ERC-7766 β†’ Signature Aggregation β†’ reduces gas per UserOp bundle by up to 40%.
  • ERC-7902 β†’ Wallet Capability Discovery β†’ lets dApps know if wallet supports recovery/session keys.
ERC-7766 & ERC-7902
ERC-7766 & ERC-7902

Risks & Challenges

  1. Bundler Centralization β€” today <10 major bundlers handle 90% of traffic.
  2. Paymaster Dependence β€” gas sponsorship could become gatekept.
  3. Gas Overhead β€” still ~15–20% higher in ERC-4337 vs EOAs.
  4. User Confusion β€” multiple standards (4337, 7702, 7766) may overwhelm.
Bundler & Paymaster Risks.
Bundler & Paymaster Risks.

Real-World Adoption

  • Safe (ex-Gnosis Safe): Leading ERC-4337 wallet with millions of accounts.
  • Argent: Social recovery + paymaster gas sponsorship.
  • MetaMask Snaps: Testing 4337 integration.
  • Pectra testnets: Nethermind, Geth clients already running EIP-7702 test code.
 Ethereum Notes showing Pectra upgrade timeline.
Ethereum Notes showing Pectra upgrade timeline.

Practical Advice

For Users

  • Try wallets like Safe or Argent with ERC-4337 today.
  • Look for wallets adding 7702 post-Pectra.
  • Enable recovery features now (guardians, biometrics).

For Developers

  • Integrate UserOps (4337) now β€” code stays valid.
  • Monitor 7702 testnets for smoother UX.
  • Adopt ERC-7766 for efficiency & ERC-7902 for wallet-dApp handshakes.

FAQs

Q1. Will ERC-4337 be replaced by 7702?
No. Both complement each other.

Q2. Do I need a new address for smart accounts?
Not with 7702 β€” your EOA gets smart logic temporarily.

Q3. How many smart accounts exist today?
~1.8M accounts, growing fast across Ethereum & rollups.

Q4. What risks remain?
Bundler centralization, paymaster dependence, gas overhead.


Official Sources


Conclusion

Ethereum’s account abstraction journey is not about 4337 vs 7702. It’s about 4337 + 7702 + 7766 + 7902, a gradual evolution towards mainstream wallets.

By 2025, smart accounts are no longer niche β€” they are becoming the default. But centralization, gas costs, and user education remain hurdles.

Your takeaway: ERC-4337 is here, 7702 is coming, and the next wave of wallets will redefine Ethereum UX forever.


Read Also: